Monday, January 02, 2006

NEW YEAR LACKS PLAYERS' POINT-OF-VIEW

Unless you have been as oblivious as Ron Artest's conscience, you know that 2005 was marred with tragedy. The Indian Ocean tsunami aftermath, the London suicide bombings and Hurricane Katrina were the year's most prevalent themes.

Although sports suffered no such catastrophe, some of its stars took the fun out of life's largest playing field. And with increasing fragmentation where seemingly every country's telecasters are producing ridiculous reality shows, that's especially not a good thing because there's less and less substance to watch. Sports is needed as a distraction from all the terrible trends accumulating in our television sets.


But the 2005 sports calendar was overwhelmed by the Artests (off-the-court distractions), Terrell Owens (contract disputes) and Rafael Palmeiros (criminal offenses) who laid out a buffet for reporters to consume multiple helpings of heated commentary. For that, you could have easily switched the station to "Judge Judy," "Jerry Springer" or even "Being Bobby Brown" and received the same content.

Well, as the New Year arrived in a Dwyane Wade-like "flash" of disco balls, I realized something had been missing in the final wake of sports' disgraceful tidal wave.

During several game broadcasts in the past holiday week, occasional pre-tapings aired of players wishing everyone a Happy Holiday and New Year. But they also could have personally addressed their own New Year's resolutions, especially in light of all the negativity that surrounded the sports world this past year. It might sound like a subtlety, but it ripples a more important issue.

After most sporting events, journalists provide an outlet to hear or read about players' reactions to their performances in various competitions. But once the holiday hits, reporters from near and far transform into Bill Murray's character in "Groundhog Day." Over and over again, duplicate articles appear discussing their best and worst moments and what the year in sports meant to them. It's one of the several times in sports, including the Super Bowl and March Madness, where the story is pre-determined and they know exactly what to write.

But journalists seem to lose sight of the authentic sources - the players - who are the ones ultimately competing under the Friday night lights. Players should be given the opportunity to discuss amongst themselves in a roundtable format the games they thought were memorable, the accomplishments they hoped to achieve and the valuable lessons sports taught them. In addition, they should get a chance to recognize their mistakes, suggest how to solve them and give their thoughts on the state of sports heading into 2006.

Journalists can use whichever words they want to make up players' resolutions, but doing so separates both sides even more because athletes don't like to be assumed. Not only would air time or page space give them a chance to speak for themselves, but it would also provide a personal touch to their personalities.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

We tend to think of athletes superficially as if they were there only to entertain us not to educate us. And yet, there is much to learn about playing on teams and being a team player,achieving your work ethic and being able to combine the difficult life of work and play as Van Gundy described. What you have done is worthy of a journalist, to respect the people you write about.

zlm said...

jared,

hmmm. i'm a little confused. i read/hear players points of view all the time, probably even more than i would care to. Why do you feel that there is a lack of a voice amongst them? Even if it isn't prompted by journalists, sites like NBA.com and www.hoopshype.com often give players both PR-friendlt and angst-ridden forums to talk about whatever they please. And, in the end, does it really matter what game Ricky Davis thought he played best in, or what Danny Granger's new year's resolution is? In a year where tsunamis, Katrinas, secret prisons, and Parisian ruckus barely held the NorthEast's attention, maybe we should ignore the Brown/Marbury feud and listen to what non-millionaires have real gripes about.

Good blog, though, buddy. It's nice to start a discourse.

zlm said...

don't get me wrong, either. I do learn alor from hearing from players. The way that some of them describbe their teamplay, comaraderie, and inner/outer battles is like something out of a Tai Chi study. But I do realize that the attention I gave to NBA players is better directed elsewhere, in the larger scheme of things.

Anonymous said...

"But the journalists lose sight of the authentic source - the players - who are the ones ultimately competing under the friday night lights. The players themselves should be able to reflect on the games they thought were memorable, the accomplishments they hoped to achieve and the valuable lessons sports taught them. In addition, they should get a chance to recognize their mistakes, suggest how to solve them and give their thoughts..."

Hi, I know you mentioned that the should be given the opportunity to reflect publicly on their year thorugh their voice, but I'm wondering- What type of outlets do these players have to address this??? And how will these fans become aware....?

just a thought!!!!

Jantell, 20
New York, NY

Anonymous said...

I often think that sports figures are puppets who have been told what they can and cannot say by the teams who hired them. Eventhough they make millions, they may not have the freedom to say things as they truly see them; they represent a team, a league and they can be sued, dropped from a team or league. Damon Jones,for instance, let out some of what he had been feeling about the Heat organization after he became connected with another team. Was he able to voice his opinions freely while a member of the Heat?? You have to have gutts and position like Shaq to speak freely. Most employees don't have that no matter how much they are making... and most organizations don't really want to know. The sports public loses out in seeing sports figure as "real people" whose issues go beyond the emotions they sometimes express on the court.

You open up some behind the closed door issues. Thanks

Jared and Alex said...

It would be interesting to see how much public relations and marketing plays a role in allowing what a player can and cannot say. Sometimes you wonder if a player is programmed to say certain things because they can sound so bland and clichish. Then you see them in a behind-the-scenes show and they seem so funny and enthusiastic. Overall, players should be given the opportunity more to discuss sports issues amongst themselves in a roundtable format. It's more pure to hear or read about what makes players tick because they're the ones ulimately competing.